I thought I recalled that being driven by the SGML declaration ....
But I suspect it would be an easier starting point anyway, since it
guarantees a consistent form for the tags. I wasn't trying to convert to
XML, so my issues were different.
Good luck
Dan York wrote:
>Mark,
>
>> Since Dan had already taken care of tag case and attribute quoting,
>> the utility of sgmlnorm may not have occurred to him; I have found it
>> useful it dealing with various normalization issues in the past.
>Hmmmm.... interesting command. Definitely looks like it could have helped
>me. No, I didn't know about it. The only thing is that the one on my
>system (Red Hat Linux 6.2) converts all tags to UPPERCASE, which is exactly
>NOT what I want to do. Perhaps there is a newer version somewhere.
>Thanks for the tip,
>Dan
>--
>Dan York, Director of Training