Most of the effort that used to be going into DSSSL now seems to be
directed towards XSL. This may be the wave of the future, but I personally
find it unfortunate. While (Open)Jade does not implement the whole DSSSL
standard, I still find it a more useful tool than any of the XML based
tools (partially familiarity on my part, I admit, but also because of the
difference in orientation/output forms).
At 05:14 PM 8/27/01 +0100, Tony Graham wrote:
>Yann Dirson wrote at 27 Aug 2001 17:46:47 +0200:
> > > There's also the now-defunct DSSSL Documentation Project at
> >
> > defunct ?
>
>Would you settle for "moribund"?
>
>I happen to know that the main person behind the DSSSL Documentation
>Project hasn't worked on it for years and, in fact, no longer works
>for Mulberry Technologies. Furthermore, I have no expectation that
>anyone else at Mulberry Technologies will do any work on the DSSSL
>Documentation Project.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>Tony Graham
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Tony Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
>Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3 x(70)19708
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
Mark B. Wroth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>