/ Lars Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Good Evening, | Bruno Vernay did some research an found out that there is only one public | dtd with xhtml and mathml support. | ><!DOCTYPE html | > PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0//EN" | > "http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/dtd/xhtml-math11-f.dtd"> | the problem is that this dtd is xhtml 1.1 which means >strict< and will not | validate with most of docbook-xsl output.
I'd be interested in knowing what problems you're having with the stylesheet output. Certainly the DocBook XHTML stylesheets ought to output the right thing directly. This may require some more parameterization, of course, but I'm game :-) | My question is if would not be the best to create seperate xhtml | stylesheets No. | that create no presentation markup and rely completely on css. Yes. :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Nothing is more depressing than http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | consolations based on the Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | necessity of evil, the uselessness | of remedies, the inevitability of | fate, the order of Providence, or | the misery of the human condition. | It is ridiculous to try to | alleviate misfortune by observing | that we are born to be | miserable.--Montesquieu