On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:36:37PM +0100, Jens Stavnstrup wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Sven Kitschke wrote: > > > My questions are now: > > - What would be the right way: change docbook stylesheets or FOP? > > - What say the xsl-fo specs (I know: RTFSpec :-). Maybe > > someone else has done this before and can answer.) > > - If we/I would customize the stylesheets, would this > > cause side effects? > > > The right way would of course be to fix FOP, but that is not going to > happen any tie soon. So the next best approach would be to write a > customized stylesheet (with a quick fix - properly to link to the page as > you do, or maybe to a redifine the main template in fo/fop.xsl to point > to first first block in component - yes bad hack) > > My stylesheet is full of bad temporary "FOP fixes". >
I agree that this should be fixed in FOP, not the DocBook stylesheets. As a point of reference, PassiveTex produces chapter bookmarks that work using the Docbook stylesheets (with parameter passivetex.extensions=1). Also, a quick check of the Apache Bugzilla shows that this bug has been reported to the FOP project. So while we wait for a fix, a customization file workaround is about all you can do. -- Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796 Caldera International, Inc. fax: (831) 429-1887 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]