On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:22:50AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > Now if a number of people did voice in saying that's the kind of processing > they really need, that there is a clean and public description with > review of the suggested extension, then I would certainly be an early > implementor of said feature. > > Makes sense ?
Yes, it does. I don't know what Eric's complaint with the existing <![%cond;[..]]> mechanism is. Eric? Tim. */
msg06124/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
