At 11:33 11/10/2002, Daniel Veillard wrote: > I don't affirm or deny anything w.r.t. conditionalization needs. I'm >just stating my position as the guys who implement and maintain the >friggin' code, okay !
Corr, he's a bad tempered old b isn't he :-) > I'm not convinced that one need acces to the DocType to conditionalize >*processing* . > I don't want to add an add-hoc unspecified unstructured processing >to my toolkit and maintain it. I think you're right btw Daniel. Specials? Bah humbug I think is the atypical reply. Regards DaveP.