Well, it seems this element has a long tradition of being ignored by the
stylesheets. 8^)
The citebiblioid element was added in DocBook 4.2, which is about 5 years
old. As far as I can tell, it has never been handled by the XSL
stylesheets. I can't find any bug reports that include that element name
in the summary line on SourceForge either. I'm mystified that no one
noticed before.
Could someone please file a bug report on SourceForge to get this included?
Thanks.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kilian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas Schraitle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] ...but no template matches.
You wrote you don't use a customization layer so I suppose it has
something to do with a missing namespace or the like. Do you use
XIncludes?
No, I don't.
I grepped all of the stylesheets - the string "citebibloid" does not
occur at all. Is it possible that not all of the DocBook 5.0 elements are
supported yet by DocBook XSL?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
