On 5/28/13 3:06 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote: > I'm not sure whether chunkfast.xsl is really that faster then chunk.xsl.
It is, but only by 10% or so. > But in your case I would try and benchmark Saxon instead of xsltproc. On > larger documents and complex transforms it's usually much faster. Saxon 6.5 was twice as slow for me. After some more digging, I think it's not the XSLT implementation, it's the stylesheet implementation. If I turn off index generation, preface, section, chapter, appendix, and footnote numbering, as well as the legalnotice link, I get performance comparable to DSSSL. Apparently, the numbers are recomputed for every chunk. It would probably be better if they were computed just once and cached, not unlike what chunkfast does for the chunks themselves. I might take a stab at implementing something like that. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
