On 2015-09-14 03:07, Eric Streit wrote:
I tried DBLaTeX: the output is better, but it's only docbook 4.
Not sure what you mean here. You mean you're still working in DB4? I
vaguely recall that we started out using dblatex with DB4 before we
moved to DB5. At any rate we've been using dblatex with DB5 for a long
time. I *think* dblatex still handles DB4, but I haven't tried it for
years (if at all).
Some of the above problems were solved using DBLaTeX, but the output
needs some adjustements: maybe new styles ....
No doubt. Fortunately and unfortunately, there's a huge number of pages
on the web about formatting LaTeX documents to look like nearly anything
you can imagine. FWIW, I would recommend using xelatex, rather than
vanilla latex, because xelatex (often referred to as xetex: xetex is to
xelatex as tex is to latex) handles Unicode UTF-8 out of the box.
Almost all LaTeX packages can be used in XeLaTeX (the ones that can't
are mostly ones that do something special with non-unicode characters).
dblatex will output xe(la)tex-conformant code if you give it the command
line parameter
-b xetex
Mike Maxwell
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
