On 16.10.2015 02:10, Thomas Schraitle wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:25:51 -0400 > Stefan Seefeld <ste...@seefeld.name> wrote: > >> [... GitHub ...] >> DocBook as organization > Stefan, I fear your claim isn't completely right. :) Technically, > DocBook isn't an organisation on GitHub, it's just a normal user named > "DocBook". :)
I stand corrected. :-) > > Shouldn't this be migrated to an organization instead of having a normal > user? According to https://help.github.com/articles/about-organizations/ > > About organizations > Organizations are great for businesses and large open-source projects > that need multiple owners and administrators, grouped together with > teams that determine affinity and repository permissions. > > I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would fit > for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be > beneficial to have one as it allows more fine-grained repository > permissions? Not sure if that's a good thing for DocBook. > > Just my thoughts. :)) Yes, I fully agree to the above. Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
