The obvious question George - why doesn't the docbook section need the attach?
Curious! regards On 9 February 2016 at 09:11, George Bina <geo...@oxygenxml.com> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Try adding an attach action on the MathML namespace. This will attach the > content in MathML to the validation candidate triggered by the <validate > schema="docbook.rng"/> action. Change the NVDL script as below: > > <rules xmlns="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/nvdl/ns/structure/1.0"; > startMode="docbook"> > <mode name="docbook"> > <namespace ns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";> > <validate schema="docbook.rng"/> > </namespace> > <namespace ns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";> > <attach/> > <validate schema="../xsd/mathml3/mathml3.xsd"/> > </namespace> > </mode> > </rules> > > Best Regards, > George > -- > George Cristian Bina > <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger > http://www.oxygenxml.com > > > On 09/02/16 02:33, Bob Stayton wrote: >> >> I'm having a problem trying to process DocBook 5 documents using NVDL in >> order to validate DocBook content that has MathML content within >> equation or inlineequation. The DocBook validation side is failing, but >> only under NVDL. >> >> The DocBook rng schema for inlineequation is as follows: >> >> <define name="db.inlineequation.content"> >> <choice> >> <choice> >> <oneOrMore> >> <ref name="db.inlinemediaobject"/> >> </oneOrMore> >> <oneOrMore> >> <ref name="db.mathphrase"/> >> </oneOrMore> >> </choice> >> <oneOrMore> >> <ref name="db._any.mml"/> >> </oneOrMore> >> </choice> >> </define> >> >> This schema specifies either a) inlinemediaobject or mathphrase, or b) >> some MathML elements. It *allows* MathML, but it does not validate it >> against the MathML DTD. NVDL is capable of doing that. But ... >> >> When I set up NVDL using a schema like this: >> >> <rules xmlns="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/nvdl/ns/structure/1.0"; >> startMode="docbook"> >> <mode name="docbook"> >> <namespace ns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";> >> <validate schema="docbook.rng"/> >> </namespace> >> <namespace ns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";> >> <validate schema="../xsd/mathml3/mathml3.xsd"/> >> </namespace> >> </mode> >> </rules> >> >> This DocBook content validates against docbook.rng: >> >> <para><inlineequation> >> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";> >> ... >> </math> >> </inlineequation></para> >> >> But when processed with NVDL, it fails with this message: >> >> Engine name: Jing >> Severity: error >> Description: element "inlineequation" incomplete; expected element >> "alt", "inlinemediaobject" or "mathphrase" or an element from another >> namespace >> >> I think what is happening is that Jing has sent the <math> element to be >> validated against the MathML schema, and then it sends the remains of >> the inlineequation element to be validated against the DocBook schema. >> But now inlineequation is empty, and fails validation. >> >> I find if I insert an empty <mathphrase> inside inlineequation, then I >> can work around this error. Does anyone have any other ideas? That is, >> short of customizing the docbook equation elements to allow them to be >> empty. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
