On Jan 29, 2019, at 9:23 AM, Bob Stayton <b...@sagehill.net> wrote:
> 
> The generated copyright symbol uses a template named 'dingbat' in fo/fo.xsl.  
> It sets the font-family to the $dingbat.fontset which is defined in 
> fo/pagesetup.xsl.

I remember a time when such hacks were common and reasonable, but is it not now 
past time where we can safely assume reasonable code point coverage in fonts?

I get that there are poor-quality fonts or those that were designed back in the 
8-bit character days, but do you want to be using those in DocBook 
applications, anyway?

And if it is not yet time to pull all those hacks out, then when?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Reply via email to