I'll put that on the list of things to clarify as we work on the next edition.
Dick --------------------------------- XML Press XML for Technical Communicators http://xmlpress.net (970) 231-3624 > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Walsh [mailto:n...@nwalsh.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 6:00 AM > To: Dave Pawson > Cc: Dick Hamilton; 'docbook' > Subject: [docbook] Re: literal element db v5 > > > Dave Pawson <da...@dpawson.co.uk> writes: > > > On 04/09/09 17:28, Dick Hamilton wrote: > >> Dave, > >> > >> role is a valid attribute on literal and is a common > >> attribute. > > > >> Since role is user-defined, creating separate names for > >> each element lets customizers define the contents of > >> role independently for different elements. > >> > >> So, it's a common attribute by virtue of being common, > >> but is defined separate from db.common.attributes so > >> that it can be customized. > > > > So it is a tdg omission then? > > Well. At the very least, it's not very clear :-) > http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch05.html#ch05-classrole Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <n...@nwalsh.com> | Men are more like the times they live http://nwalsh.com/ | in than they are like their | fathers.--Ali Ibn-abi-talib --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
