Keith's note and this thread are causing me to lean more strongly towards using the standard repository.
But, if you do end up with a separate repository, please make sure that it is open for reading by anyone, so we have the same level of access as we currently have to the DocBook repository. Dick --------------------------------- XML Press XML for Technical Communicators http://xmlpress.net (970) 231-3624 > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Fahlgren [mailto:abdela...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 2:05 PM > To: Richard Hamilton > Cc: Sina Khakbaz Heshmati; docbook@lists.oasis-open.org; > docbook-developers > Subject: Re: [docbook] Website5: Project Codename > > > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Richard Hamilton > <rlhamil...@frii.com> wrote: > > Eventually, the code will need to be merged into the > docbook repository, > > and possibly also dropped into a Google repository. > > > > That said, I don't see any problem using another repository for > > development. Does anyone see a problem with that? > > I would prefer that DocBook-XSL code continued to be consolidated in > the SVN repository at > https://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/docbook (feel free to use > a branch). That said, if there are compelling reasons for hosting it > elsewhere *OR* if the project would work better as a standalone entity > that interoperated well with DocBook-XSL (and there are a lot of > downsides to integrating into a project as huge as DocBook-XSL), go > for it. > > > Keith > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-h...@lists.oasis-open.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-h...@lists.oasis-open.org