hi, I have a docbook 5 file with a captioned html table that contains 'tr/td/para/informaltable'.
I can see in the docbook 5 reference that the combination is illegal, but I thought that in the more recent 5.1b2 specs, it was legal. http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/html.table.html Of course, when opening the document with XMLMind 4.9.1 I get the validation error: "informaltable must not occur in the descendants of table" However, when I use xerces, oNVDL.jar and the docbook 5.1b2 nvdl specification, the document validates. Also, xmllint validates the file using docbook 5.1b2 relaxng. My question is whether I really should not have the nested table, or should I not trust the nvdl/relaxng validation ? thanks, --Tim Arnold --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
