Hi,
currently, I've experienced some issues with the abstract element and
I'm wondering why it allows para elements only.
According to the reference documentation of DocBook 4 and 5 [see 1,2],
abstract is definied like this:
abstract ::= (title?, (formalpara|para|simpara)+)
Well, for a short summary with only text, this is probably fine.
However, sometimes it is not enough.
Let's assume, you have written a nice tutorial or howto and have the
following summary in mind:
In this chapter we learn:
* how to download the xyz tool
* how to configure and compile xyz
* how to install xyz on your computer
With the current content modell, you can't do this:
<info>
<abstract>
<para>In this chapter we learn:</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>how to download the xyz tool</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>how to configure and compile xyz</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>how to install xyz on your computer</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</abstract>
</info>
So I'm wondering why abstract disallows block elements as its children.
There are probably other examples where abstract is too strict.
Historical reasons? Could/should we change that?
------
[1] http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/abstract.html
[2] http://www.docbook.org/tdg51/en/html/abstract.html
--
Gruß/Regards,
Thomas Schraitle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
