Hi,
I've downloaded the DocBook 5.1 RNG schema from [1]. However, I've
stumbled upon an embedded Schematron pattern which doesn't make sense
to me. For me it smells like a bug. ;)
For example, one of this embedded Schematron pattern looks like this
(shortend):
----------
<define name="db.procedure">
<!-- ... -->
<s:pattern>
<title>Root must have version</title>
<s:rule context="/db:procedure">
<s:assert test="@version">If this element is...</s:assert>
</s:rule>
</s:pattern>
----------
I guess the <title> element is incorrect, right? According to the
namespace definition it belongs the the RNG namespace.
However, RNG doesn't know any title element. I assume it's a typo and
it should be <s:title>, right?. According to the Schematron RNG
schema[2], s:pattern allows an s:title...
Can somebody confirm my observation? Or do I miss something?
I've checked that for 5.1 and 5.2b01. Both contains this problem.
For 5.0, there is still an invalid @name attribute which causes oXygen
to complain. For 5.0, there were some GitHub issues[3,4] which were
fixed. However, if you download the DocBook 5.0 RNG schema it still
contains these @name attributes. As the change wasn't reflected on the
docbook.org page I've opened a GitHub issue[5].
Hope this helps. :)
-------- References
[1] http://docbook.org/xml/5.1/rng/docbook.rng
[2] https://github.com/Schematron/schema/blob/master/schematron.rnc
[3] https://github.com/docbook/docbook/issues/2
[4] https://github.com/docbook/docbook/issues/48
[5] https://github.com/docbook/docbook/issues/88
--
Gruß/Regards,
Thomas Schraitle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
