Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:52:57AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
So what do you think, should we drop [toc] or [top]? or should we keep both?
I'd say we drop TOC.
* as both link to nearly the same place, I think one is enough * TOP is understandable to people that don't speak english that well. TOC (as an abbrevation of Table Of Content) is a little harder to understand (at least I didn't know what it should mean when I first discovered it, but after clicking on it and finding myself on a Table Of Content I got it...) So I'd prefer TOP
+1 on dropping TOC.
is take23.org actice still? The last post there is dated 2001-06-07.[EMAIL PROTECTED] to start with. May have more in the future.
I don't know. It may come back, we can always remove the link :) But I think we do want to link for example to ASF and httpd.apache.org?
Alternatively I suggest to have two menu bars once for the internal content and second for outgoing links? I dunno, just an idea. I'm notWhat about a "Links" section?
Yes we "will have/have" it already, I was just thinking that since we have a lot of empty space under the menu we could actually make some of the most significant sites outstanding. e.g.
Sisters: -------- ASF Apache perl.org
then we can add a feed from perl.org and other cool stuff
_____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
