At 02:46 PM 12/31/01 +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: >> Well, it's not really "un-readable", but it doesn't render that well. I'll >> attach a Netscape 4.08 on Windows screen shot. > >But this is a different design, isn't it? We are trying to decide >whether we can go with table-less skeleton from Thomas? >http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/meta.html
For those try the following links: Note that although they are different renderings, it's not really dependent on style6 vs. style7. Netscape seems to get confused, as they both start out looking like style7, but then (in the case of style6.png) redraws the screen when I scroll or resize. I've had to limit my use of some sytle settings with Netscape. http://hank.org/images/style6.png http://hank.org/images/style7.png Actually, that simply style7.png is kind of nice to look at. -- Bill Moseley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
