:: MS IE6 - that is internet explorer 6+, right? Correct.
:: the little i have used that browser i find it still :: pretty much beta with regard to fonts, so we might not even :: be able to fix it at all (when we only use one stylesheet) :: but im not at all sure and i can not check. Not true. IE6 is general release now, not beta. Font handling is absolutely fine, I have never encountered problems before with HTML or CSS. No problems with other websites either. :: hmm, so its more like a system thing then ... Oh it's definitely a browser thing (IE6). But I don't think that's the issue. The problem, whether you like it or not, is that IE has >50% market share according to BrowserWatch (http://browserwatch.internet.com/stats/stats.html). On my own web-servers IE (v4+) accounts for 82.6% of all traffic and I know many webmasters who will offer similar reports. Now while I agree that we should make our site 100% standards compliant, I'm concerned by these figures. :: <OT> :: > Ignore the OS X cosmetics the platform is IE6 on Win2K as stated :: > above. :: how could i ignore that? :: is the chrome really that configurable for that platform? Windows 2000 is not all that skinnable in itself no. But with the addition of the amazing software produced by Stardock (http://www.stardock.com/) I can transform the desktop completely along with about 95% of my installed applications. So my Windows 2000 environment has been customised to resemble Apple's OS X. However, I did without that stupid dock and deployed a much more usable, configurable and less distracting one. For those of you who have interest in these things, I've put a screenshot on the web at: http://wypug.digital-word.com/miscellaneous/w2k_aqua.jpg (656Kb). :: </OT> Jonathan M. Hollin - WYPUG Co-ordinator West Yorkshire Perl User Group http://wypug.pm.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
