Bill Moseley wrote:
At 09:45 PM 04/15/02 +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:

Bill Moseley wrote:
Why cannot we use file:// URIs instead of http:// and then the
requests will come via the fs and not the webserver.


Because it's probably easier to get Apache to give us a date than to
rewrite all the current code?  Have do deal with things like:

Can't locate object method "userinfo" via package "URI::file" at
./spider.pl line 152.

And deal with / => /index.html.

Could just index the file system but http spidering is best for this small
site since it indexes what is really on the site instead of what happens to
be in the directory structure.  I know that should be the same, but, for
example, in my dst_html/search directory I have lots of extra junk from
testing and then that would get indexed.

yes, but you spider by following only the links, exactly the same way you did over http://


But other things are valid of course. So do you think this patch will just work?

--


__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to