At 17:22 16.04.2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
At 03:49 PM 04/16/02 +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
>Bill Moseley wrote:
>> Ok, back on http://hank.org:5000
>>
>> - style sheet changes: The underline I mentioned before. It seems to be a
>> little more lively than the previous lighter gray hover. + or - ?
>
>I'm +0 on this change. Shouldn't then all hover behave in the same way?
>e.g. the links on the index.html pages (to the docs) are still the old way.


Probably, but I only did that menu on my site for you to preview.  It seems
there's a couple of link styles.

I think that hover should be active, but to me the hover currently seems
like the item is un-selected because it goes to a color closer to the
background.  Using underline seems to be a bit more lively.

If everyone is +0 then it's not worth the effort, but I think the site
could use a little more spice.

I'm +1 after all, I've been told that the site looks "a little grey", so it's ok to liven it up. But I think we should only keep it like that in the menu, it's not an issue anywhere else. And you're +1 too, so I think we can go with this change, as there aren't many objections I think.


>I've an alternative solution. Move from checkboxes to pulldown menu with
>'This' as a default. Solves all the layout changes problems and gives
>you a bunch of new possibilities (like adding more options there!). Also
>takes less space.

+1 on this.



>That said, How about moving the search back into the nav bar? This will
>make things so much simpler for the search (simple search on top) extra
>button to bring the advanced search.

The problem was that Netscape 4 made the input field so huge, but maybe
that's fixed with the style sheet addition.

If I understand correctly, you don't really like the side-bar search
because it uses too much space?  I'd agree there.

I think we could make the search a small input box and a graphic button.

We made the change, and I think it looks good as-is. Not that it matters very much to me, but it's much more eye-catching like this.


--

Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to