>Hum, what about two different sections? One for the current >success stories and another place to post articles (short >little "how to" or "how I solve this problem", or "how to do >foo with mod_perl"?) Perrin's article is somewhat in between.
Yes, I was thinking along these lines too. There's Perrin's and the Salon.com article which both illustrate well mod_perl's power and scalability. Salon still uses the mod_perl setup their paper describes, but I don't think eToys does. Now we have a "Sites Running mod_perl" section and we also have a "Success Stories" section. Surely the eToys paper belongs in *success*? I'm certain that it shouldn't be in the former section, which should just describe sites using mod_perl *today*. Perrin's offer of HTML, POD and PDF versions of his paper (with illustrations) should be accepted for certain. Maybe this is for purely selfish reasons but one thing's for certain - I'll do better with potential clients with these documents than I would without! Jonathan M. Hollin - WYPUG Co-ordinator West Yorkshire Perl User Group http://wypug.pm.org/ http://wypug.digital-word.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
