Hi! On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 08:14:55PM +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > Yes, it's a difficult point. I guess DocSet could be introduced into the > Pod:: or HTML:: categories without anyone complaining, although it looks > strange because we can extend DocSet. App:: seems a little too generic > though. I guess we could pass with "DocSet" as there are already many > modules like that that don't fit into a particular category. But I agree, > let's follow the guidelines. So Pod:: would be my pick for lack of a better > name.
Pod:: was also my first thought. But App:: would also be well suited, because DocSet isn't really just a module you use in your scripts. -- #!/usr/bin/perl http://domm.zsi.at for(ref(bless[],just'another'perl'hacker)){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/} --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
