Bill, should we upgrade the binary on daedalus as well? I'm not
symlinking to your copy. I use a real copy. Or should we leave things as is?


http://www.swish-e.org/current/docs/CHANGES.html doesn't show anything
that effects what we are doing.  Might as well wait for 2.4 I would have
thought that HTMLLinksMetaName was in our version, but I'd have to look at
the cvs to see when that was added.

ok

In cvs swish.cgi can use the swish-e library and also has a feature
suggested by Brian B. to run /bin/ps and not run swish-e if there's too
many running already.

search.apache.org was getting hit hard and there were a bunch of swish-e
processes using up resources.  My tests showed that running the script
under mod_perl with max_clients set only to two was a better solution
that running /bin/ps ;)

It might be helpful if search.apache.org wasn't listed as an example the
flood docs!

Hey, is there any reason to have search.apache.org index perl.apache.org?
I'm indexing almost 80,000 files (Jakarta has 10,000 dirs) and it
generates a 200M index file so any
reduction would be nice.

My opinion is that if you can keep it in, please keep it. I'm sure some people come to perl.apache.org because their were looking for something on apache.org and surprising have found it on our site. So it's a good thing. We have only about 500+ docs, so it's not that of a big save, isn't it?


__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to