On 08.10.2007, at 16:36, Lucien GENTIS wrote:
Jason Lingohr a écrit :
On 8/10/2007 2:52 AM, Lucien GENTIS wrote:
Hi to all,
Branche 2.2 - file manual/logs.xml - lines 93 and 97:
I think "entry" should be replaced by "item"
Lucien
I don't actually agree.
This is traditionally the language used to refer to lines in log
files -- much like the classic "captain's log" entries in Star
Trek ;)
Yes, but in this case, the paragraph describes an entry, and refers
to different parts of this entry with "First item . . ., Second
entry, . . ., Third entry
As First is an item, second and third should also be items.
Yes, I agree.
A single line in the logfile is titled as an entry here, and a single
part of this log line is then titled as an item...
There are two more occurences (in paragraphs about "frank (%u)" and
"2326 (%b)") where we should use "part" or "item" instead of entry
(I'd tend to "part" in these two latter cases).
Cheers,
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
