On 11/05/2008 09:24 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:02:55 -0600 > Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> Any suggestions of how we can set up an 'extra' modules area for >>> very simple modules such as cern_meta and imagemap which are so >>> old and crusty, it isn't sensible to ever ship them in 2.4 or 3.0 >>> flavors of httpd? > > Indeed. But supporting them at the level of "still works" should > be trivial. > >> delete them. > > -1. Stop packaging them, but keep them in an attic for anyone > who still wants them.
I agree. What is the real burden of keeping them around and remove them from building by default? They don't seem to require much maintenance and they don't eat significant space in the distribution. Regards RĂ¼diger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
