Hi Dan, I feel that even though the content is more or less same between the two docs, their content is more organized. In the HEADER directive document, there is no ambiguity to a new user on the numbering of the arguments, and their usage. Perhaps it is just me - when I read the HEADER directive on apache docs it took me 3-4 reads before getting it right, but their (IBM) presentation of the same content was easier to understand and grasp (no ambiguity, whatsoever). Just my two cents. -Sreedhar
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Dan Poirier <[email protected]> wrote: > Sreedhar Madullapalli <[email protected]> writes: > > > Thanks for the prompt correction, and consideration. Not sure if I can > > mention any documentation references outside the ASF foundations, but > this > > httpd documentation on IBM's website does a real good job of documenting > the > > mod_headers, and HEADER directive. > > > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/iseries/v5r2/ic2924/info/rzaie/rzaiemod_headers.htm > > What do you see there that you think is better than the apache docs? > > > I did check the dev trunk (2.3) and though the rewording take care of the > > ambiguity, I feel that there is room for improvement. > > -Sreedhar > > Specific suggestions for improvement are always welcome, or even better, > patches. > > Dan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- -Sreedhar Rao
