> -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Bray [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:10 PM > > On 14 May 2010 13:50, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, I suppose static is preferable to dynamic. Very good points. > > Which just leaves the fun question of where to link to. Can we now > have a /docs/current/ or /docs/stable/ ? Perhaps one that redirects to > the numbered current/stable version. I know this subject has a long > and tedious history, but if we're going to link from old -> new, it > would be nice to keep new new.
I think this is not so easy to do, since /foo might exist in 1.3 and 2.2 but is removed in a future version. You then would have to go back and edit 1.3 anyway. The redirector solution allows you to dynamically update the map. A dynamic include could also alter the warning message in old docs (e.g. mod_auth was replaced, read here for the new ...) or even display various version in future docs. I can help with the latter two. For changing the static files, I'll leave that for somebody else. Vincent de Lau [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
