Author: jwage
Date: 2008-09-12 18:57:20 +0100 (Fri, 12 Sep 2008)
New Revision: 4953

Modified:
   
branches/1.0/docs/manual/de/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt
   
branches/1.0/docs/manual/en/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt
   branches/1.0/docs/manual/ja/improving-performance.txt
   
branches/1.0/docs/manual/pt_BR/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt
Log:
fixes #1446


Modified: 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/de/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt
===================================================================
--- 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/de/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt  
    2008-09-12 17:39:39 UTC (rev 4952)
+++ 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/de/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt  
    2008-09-12 17:57:20 UTC (rev 4953)
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 </code> Can you think of any benefit of having objects in the view instead of 
arrays? You're not going to execute business 
 logic in the view, are you? One parameter can save you a lot of unnecessary 
processing:
 <code type="php">
- ... ->execute(array(1), Doctrine::FETCH_ARRAY);
+ ... ->execute(array(1), Doctrine::HYDRATE_ARRAY);
 </code> This will return a bunch of nested php arrays. It could look something 
like this, assuming we fetched some comments:
 <code>
 array(5) (

Modified: 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/en/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt
===================================================================
--- 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/en/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt  
    2008-09-12 17:39:39 UTC (rev 4952)
+++ 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/en/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt  
    2008-09-12 17:57:20 UTC (rev 4953)
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 </code> Can you think of any benefit of having objects in the view instead of 
arrays? You're not going to execute business 
 logic in the view, are you? One parameter can save you a lot of unnecessary 
processing:
 <code type="php">
- ... ->execute(array(1), Doctrine::FETCH_ARRAY);
+ ... ->execute(array(1), Doctrine::HYDRATE_ARRAY);
 </code> This will return a bunch of nested php arrays. It could look something 
like this, assuming we fetched some comments:
 <code>
 array(5) (

Modified: branches/1.0/docs/manual/ja/improving-performance.txt
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)

Modified: 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/pt_BR/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt
===================================================================
--- 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/pt_BR/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt
   2008-09-12 17:39:39 UTC (rev 4952)
+++ 
branches/1.0/docs/manual/pt_BR/improving-performance/fetch-only-what-you-need.txt
   2008-09-12 17:57:20 UTC (rev 4953)
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 </code> Can you think of any benefit of having objects in the view instead of 
arrays? You're not going to execute business 
 logic in the view, are you? One parameter can save you a lot of unnecessary 
processing:
 <code type="php">
- ... ->execute(array(1), Doctrine::FETCH_ARRAY);
+ ... ->execute(array(1), Doctrine::HYDRATE_ARRAY);
 </code> This will return a bunch of nested php arrays. It could look something 
like this, assuming we fetched some comments:
 <code>
 array(5) (


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"doctrine-svn" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/doctrine-svn?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to