Well, it seems to me that we have a discrepancy here: either (for Canonical/on Ubuntu) the UFL is non-free or it isn't. If it is, then the other two issues are correctly open, but the fix in here (no longer marking this font as non-free) is wrong. On the other hand, if the UFL isn't non-free, this issue was correctly fixed, but the other issues should be closed.
My personal understanding used to be that the license was non-free, the confirmed state on #1167425 a sign that it being non-free wasn't disputed, and I was hopefully waiting for a resolution - but this change on fonts-ubuntu package (and the comment cited above, jusifying it) ended up confusing me. I'm bringing this up with the hope of finding clarity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754804 Title: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free Status in Ubuntu Font Licence: New Status in fonts-ubuntu package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: When using vrms, it shows fonts-ubuntu package (and ttf-ubuntu-font- family) as a non-free package. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: fonts-ubuntu 0.83-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-10.11-generic 4.15.3 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-10-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.8-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sat Mar 10 09:16:29 2018 Dependencies: InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-02-15 (22 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Alpha amd64 (20180214) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: fonts-ubuntu UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-licence/+bug/1754804/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~documentation-packages Post to : documentation-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~documentation-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
