> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:46:05PM +0200, Kent-Andre Mardal wrote: >> >> We have the following operator= in GenericVector >> >> /// Assignment operator >> virtual const GenericVector& operator= (const GenericVector& x) = 0; >> >> and a similar one in eg. EpetraVector: >> >> /// Assignment operator >> const EpetraVector& operator= (const EpetraVector& x); >> >> Is this operator an implementation of the operator in GenericVector ? >> >> Kent > > I don't think so. We have the same thing in all the concrete classes: > first > > virtual const FooVector& operator= (const GenericVector& x) = 0; > > and then also > > const FooVector& operator= (const FooVector& x) = 0; > > I don't know why we have both. I thought you added this? > > -- > Anders
I guess I`m to blame. I added it because otherwise I got into trouble. Anyway, I just added GenericVector& operator=(real a) in GenericVector and EpetraVector& operator=(real a) in EpetraVector, and this seems inconsistent with the other operator=. But seems to work fine. I am just confused about operators. Kent _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
