Anders Logg wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:59:43AM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: >> On Friday 17 April 2009 03:32:26 Garth N. Wells wrote: >>> Should we start moving to UFL-based forms for the DOLFIN demos? Is the >>> only serious outstanding issue on the FFC side the correct determination >>> of the quadrature order? >> Not sure how this could be best done in PyDOLFIN. >> >> We could add >> >> from dolfin.ufl import * >> >> after each >> >> from dolfin import * >> >> in the demos. When this is done and it all just works(TM) we can move the >> files in the site-packages/dolfin/ufl directory down to >> site-packages/dolfin, >> and remove >> >> from dolfin.ufl import * >> >> from the demos? >> >> Johan > > I suggest we just move everything to UFL at once and then solve any > problems that we encounter. > > I'm intending to remove the .form support from FFC quite soon (maybe > today). > > It's easier to fix things so that they work with UFL than to have two > conflicting form languages work at the same time. >
The quadrature issue is serious, so I think that it should be tackled before the transition, or at least a short-term plan for how to solve it should be in place. Garth > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > FFC-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
