Anders Logg wrote: > Would it be more natural to have the following interface for interpolation: > > V.interpolate(v, w); > > corresponding to w = pi_h(v). > > ? >
Yes, or w.interpolate(v) I'm still working on it. > This interpolates v into the function space and sets the coefficients > for w. This function can then detect whether or not v and w are on the > same mesh and choose the appropriate way to do interpolation. > > We can also have a special case like > > V.interpolate(v); > > which will take v and replace it by its interpolation. > Don't we pretty much have this already? v.interpolate(); Garth > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
