Ola Skavhaug wrote: > The way the GenericVector interface is implemented, a size argument to > the constructor will partition the vector on every process in > parallel. We need to be able to allocate locally sized vectors. Should > I simply use a non-parallel aware linear algebra backend for this, > like uBLAS? This will introduce a mix of different linear algebra > backends, and I'm not sure what problems lurk i the shadows if I go > down that road :) > > An alternative would be to add functionality (default argument?) to > specify scope when calling resize and friends. >
I think that we need an argument to specify the local size of a vector since this will vary across processes. Garth > _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
