Andre Massing wrote: > Hi, > > I am just wondering why GTS has been only optional in the past, although > the eval function > > void Function::eval(double* values, const double* x) const > http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin/file/32bcc3b91dd7/dolfin/function/Function.cpp#l243 > > in the Function class depends on the IntersectionDetector, which in turn > depends on GTS. >
GTS was added before eval(double* values, const double* x) for finite element functions was added and we haven't bothered reconsidering whether or not GTS should be an optional dependency sicne. Most demos should run without GTS. > Furthermore a 1D function can not evaluated at arbitrary points for > functions on 1D grids since the the IntervalCell class > > http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin/file/32bcc3b91dd7/dolfin/mesh/IntervalCell.cpp#l183 > > does not provide a implementation. > > So I wondering how these things work instead? At least I could not find > it in the docs and my benchmarks throw an exception when I tried to run > the old IntersectionDetector for 1D meshes and points intersection. > Probably never been tested before. Garth > (Of course the forthcoming CGAL interface will remedy these issues ;)) > > Greetings, > Andre > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
