On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 05:17:47PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Sunday 28 February 2010 00:15:52 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:07:28PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Is there a reason why GenericVector::set is excluded from the Python > > > interface, > > > > > > %ignore dolfin::GenericVector::set > > > > > > ? I need to be able to set values using a method which works in > > > parallel. > > > > > > Garth > > > > I don't know. I've also been wondering about this. Try adding it back > > and see what happens. > > I wasn't quite finished with the email... > > I decided to excluded it when I added the slicing interface. This was before > all changes wrt to parallel DOLFIN was made. So I suppose it is just to add it > back. > > What version of set do/did you need? > > However I remember that I have been able to use the slicing interface in > parallel. But I do not recall why it worked, I think because it just uses > set_local?
Yes. That seems a bit dangerous (but is useful in serial). -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
