> I am pretty sure the shared_array object were added as a simple way of > deciding ownership of the data. If the creation of the shared_array is costly > we could use a ownership flag instead.
Or maybe two different classes. The thing is, ownership of Array<> data is not known: if it's created with the (uint,T*) constructor then the contents will be deleted by whoever owns the T*, and it's not safe to hold references to it. Or so it seems to me. But yes, it's fairly costly. -- j. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
