On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Joachim Berdal Haga <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1) What exactly is wrong with it? We have been through this before; it >>> is useful, it is efficient, and it is no more convoluted than the >>> standard assembler (in fact, the logic is the same for the most part). >>> >> >> Your later point is why the symmetric/system assembler will/should be >> merged - they are for a large part the same, but double the work when >> changes are necessary. > > Agreed - although SystemAssembler uses a different ordering/logic > (same as the OpenMP assembler?) than the symmetric and standard > assemblers, so we will have to decide which is preferred before > merging. >
What's the difference in the logic? Garth >>> 2) Why not tell me if it's broken, so I can fix it, instead of removing it? >> >> It hasn't been removed. It doesn't follow the design pattern of the >> other assemblers (or DOLFIN objects in general), which means it could >> not inherit the AssemblerBase member functions. It needs someone to >> fix it. > > Sure. I can fix it. But only if I know about it, and I only found out > by accident. > > -j. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
