On 5 March 2013 22:47, Martin Alnæs <[email protected]> wrote: > Those would be nice, and std::shared_ptr I guess?
Depends on the SWIG support for std::shared_ptr. Maybe its trivial. > I guess the main bottleneck is compiler versions on clusters? > Yes, on old clusters. GCC 4.4 added quite some C++11 support, and Intel and IBM compilers have good support for it. After the new release I might slip some benign C++11 code into DOLFIN and see if it causes any problems. Garth > We would need to list which features to allow, the main problem > is maybe that it will be hard to enforce such limitations over time. > > Martin > > Den 5. mars 2013 kl. 22:21 skrev Anders Logg <[email protected]>: > >> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 06:45:32PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>> What are the thoughts on starting to use some C++11 features? A few >>> things, like range-based loops, initializer lists and 'auto' would be >>> pretty handy. >> >> What are the limitations for different compilers compared to what we >> require now? >> >> -- >> Anders >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
