On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Doursenaud, Raphaël < [email protected]> wrote:
> Well, planning doesn't mean we should strictly stick to it. It means we > have an objective and it gives us visibility. > > At least we should be able to announce a tentative date for release. Ask > everyone to report problems before. And move the date if too many problems > are found. > > IMO updated betas should have been numbered, tagged in git and announced > publicly. > RC cycle could have been a little bit longer and finally last RC must be > final release without any modifications. > I'd love a collaborative release process where we can all reach consensus > on the "it's ready" bit. > > Let me know if I can help. > > Cheers, > > That would be really nice. No, if I can propose a nice tracking program is trac (http://trac.edgewall.org/) it has nice features to keep track of the roadmap and bugs too. I do not know if github has something simillar. Rgds Saxa > 2012/7/13 Laurent Destailleur (eldy) <[email protected]> > > >> Release was done yesterday, news will appears soon. >> >> For regression, we discovered it too late. Sorry. >> But this will be fixed into a patch release. >> >> >> For roadmap, for the moment, there is only the bug tracker on doliforge >> (project Dolibarr). We try to work on priority 9 first. >> The problem is building a roadmap where features is provided by volunteer >> is difficult to build because we simply don't know which feature we will >> receive... >> >> >> Le 13/07/2012 11:58, Doursenaud, Raphaël a écrit : >> >> Hello developers, >> >> I just discovered today that 3.2.0 was released. I'm surprised there >> hasn't been any announcement on the mailing list. >> >> I'm also a bit disappointed because the release contains a major >> regression I have reported a few days ago ( >> https://doliforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&group_id=144&aid=444&atid=246 >> ). >> If I knew it would be released without a fix, I'd have bugged Laurent or >> Régis about it ! >> >> Do we have a roadmap, a planning or a release process which would help >> external developers to stay in sync with the maintainers decisions ? >> If these tools exists, please be kind to me, I've not been able to find >> those despite my searches. >> If not, I think we need some. >> >> So what do you think ? >> >> > -- > *Raphaël Doursenaud* > 05 35 53 97 13 - 06 68 48 20 10 > [email protected] > > > <http://gpcsolutions.fr> > http://gpcsolutions.fr > Technopole Hélioparc > 2 avenue du Président Pierre Angot > 64053 PAU CEDEX 9 > SARL GPC.solutions au capital de 7 500 € - R.C.S. PAU 528 995 921 > > _______________________________________________ > Dolibarr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Dolibarr-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
