On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Destailleur Laurent <[email protected]>wrote:
> Sourceforge.net is not possible because goal of doliforge is to provide a > solution for external editor to have a solution to manage development of > their own dolibarr module. > Such developers can decide to use on their own sf of course, but for > editor that are selling modules on dolistore, some of them prefer to have a > private area at no cost. With doliforge, we currently provide such a > feature. With sourceforge everything is public. Also, each project is > maintained by one user, there is no way to have a common setup for all > external modules. Also, i am a user of sourceforge for other of my project > (AWStats log analyzer), and i must tell it is a very very slow service. Too > slow to manage without spending hours, all works/tasks we have to with > Dolibarr and all its sub-modules. > > Ok I got it. I agree with you that sf.net is slow. As for the external modules I thought that this could be the main reason why not using sf.net. To me it is ok, with any one you guys decide to go. > We must make a difference between the bug/task tracker of dolibarr (that > is completely public and that can be on sourceforge or any even github) and > area for external modules. Currently doliforge was thought for the second > category even if we use it also for dolibarr itself. > A public bug tracker is really welcome from my point of view. In any case it is just a matter of what you get used to. I do not know much how on github things work from a bug tracker viev, but for sure having it integrated with the wiki and git repos is the way to go from my point of view. > > I have the same question than Florian, is it possible now to give > read-only permission on task and bug when user has no account ? > This for sure is possible on different bug trackers, at least on Trac and bugzilla it is. Have no idea about doliforge. Rgds Saxa > Because doliforge is currently a headach to maintain for us, using a > hosted solution where the foundation keep controls on all project at once > has also my vote. > > > > > 2014-05-20 22:01 GMT+02:00 Sasa Ostrouska <[email protected]>: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Marcos García <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Why didn't you guys think about Launchpad? It is maintained by Canonical >>> and free for open source projects. >>> >>> It is also used by major projects... I would like to know your position >>> about it. >>> >>> Excuse me if I am being a little bit annoying. >>> >>> Regards, Marcos. >>> El 20/05/2014 21:33, "Florian HENRY" <[email protected]> >>> escribió: >>> >>>> It can be nice. >>>> But what happens to the independance of the fundation platform ? >>>> >>>> We discus during the devcamp about using GitHub as bug/issues trackers, >>>> and we decide to not go this way to keep indepence of fundation. Ok, GitHub >>>> is not Open-Source, and it's a major point do not go with it. Tuleap is >>>> opensource so it can be the argument that allow to go with it. >>>> >>>> After all this consideration, I prefer to have a up-to-date platfrom, >>>> and if we canuse it as a real bug tracker for end user, it will be nice. >>>> >>> >> Why not simply use all the functionalities of SourceForge ? SF.net has >> all what is needed AFAIK, git, bugs tracker, wiki, a good web interface to >> handle everything. >> >> >>> Silly question, is it possible now to give right read-only task and bug >>>> without have and account ? >>>> >>> I think that would be no problem on sf.net >> >> Rgds >> Saxa >> >>> >>>> REgards >>>> >>>> Florian Henry+33 6 03 76 48 >>>> [email protected]http://www.open-concept.pro >>>> Twitter : @_Open_Concept_ >>>> >>>> Le 20/05/2014 18:23, Marcos García a écrit : >>>> >>>> Is it a problem to migrate to a 64 bit OS? >>>> >>>> Regards, Marcos. >>>> El 20/05/2014 17:31, "Jean-François Ferry" <[email protected]> >>>> escribió: >>>> >>>>> Hello everybody, >>>>> >>>>> Dolibarr team is currently at Paris for "Solutions Linux & open >>>>> source". I met Enalean, the company behind Tuleap which used for >>>>> https://doliforge.org >>>>> I discussed with them about this software and our usage... When I saw >>>>> we are blocked because of old OS version (i386 vs x64), they made me an >>>>> offer : they offer to host the platform as part of their new SAAS offers, >>>>> launched on the occasion of show. >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to discuss about migration (tracker V2 -> tracker V3) of all >>>>> datas. >>>>> >>>>> I invite you to test the last version of Tuleap, they made a lot of >>>>> work on the interface : https://demo-tuleap.enalean.com >>>>> >>>>> I wonder what do you think of this proposal? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Francois FERRY >>>>> 1 Allée de neuville - Res. le neuville >>>>> 34080 MONTPELLIER >>>>> tél : 06.14.94.05.46 >>>>> http://www.aternatik.fr >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dolibarr-dev mailing >>>> [email protected]https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dolibarr-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev >> >> > > > -- > Laurent Destailleur (alias Eldy) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Social networks of my OpenSource projects: > Dolibarr Google+: https://plus.google.com/+DolibarrOrg/ > Dolibarr Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dolibarr > Dolibarr Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dolibarr > AWStats Google+: https://plus.google.com/+AWStatsOrgPoject/ > AWStats Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/awstats.org > AWStats Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/awstats_project > > > _______________________________________________ > Dolibarr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Dolibarr-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
