PS, please read http://www.toms.net/rb/license.html, that will help you feel better about this. I can't emphasize enough, this is as easy as it gets, the BSD-style licenses are the shortest and sweetest. You lawyer will love it, lawyers are used to much, much more tangled webs. -Tom
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Jonathan Schedler wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 10:46:21 -0700 > From: Jonathan Schedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [dom4j-user] Licensing > > I'm not a lawyer and I am having a hard time understanding the requirements of your >license. > > I am considering using the dom4j as a persistent store api for our commercial >product. Our tool is not a commercial XML parser or XSLT or browser. > > If I have to include all of the information included on your license.html page, then >I'm afraid our corporate lawyer will gag. Is there an existing example of the minimum >requirements you are looking for us to use. > > Thanks, > Jon > _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ dom4j-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-user
