Quoting Gordon Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "domains-gen" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 1:21 PM
> Subject: [domains-gen] Advice on alternatives to CCS and the old perl system.
>
>
>> Joey deVilla just stated that "CCS, which is a complete out-of-the-box
>> solution" that I'm too dumb or impatient to get going.  Just having to
>> get Zend working well enough with PHP5.2 for a production site/system
>> is a larger challenge than I really want to face, right now.  With a
>> little more maturity on both in the future I might change if I'm still
>> around.  CCS was announced a couple of years ago, IIRC.
>>
>> I would certainly appreciate and recommendations that would help us
>> get a simple production system on line asap, with as many OpenSRS
>> products as possible.  I say simple because I'm considering
>> integrating it with joomla for all the potential bells and whistles.
>> We are using it on a few of our current customers sites and are happy
>> with it.
>>
>> Previously, we have regarded domain sales as a service to our
>> customers but not really as a profit center.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for any suggestions, and if any are using CSS in
>> production I would really like to know about your experiences.
>>
>> Have a great day,
>>
>> ed
>
> Hello Ed
>
> There is currently no solution that offers all of the services with  
> all of the most likely payment gateways.

Hi Gordon,

I probably wasn't clear but I don't expect, although it would be nice  
;) all of anything.  As they say beggers can't be choosers and I'm  
almost to the point of begging.  I would be happy with a solution that  
can handle 50% right now.

> CCS seems to only handle certain domain extensions.

I would be content to have CCS work and be able to build from there  
but the place where it fails is of course one of the compiled file  
which I can't fix and certainly can't take live without having access  
to be able to repair.  I've never understood that logic.  If they  
really open CCS, it would probably be usable in a few months but that  
is just my opinion based on my experience in opensource projects.

> What you might want to look at is hacking the client code to provide  
> an ordering framework.
> This is essentially what I did a few years ago.
> We do not have an automated system but its not completely manual either.
> Its a pity the system won't just accept name value pairs across  
> https as this would be much easier to work with but I guess there  
> are security implications.
> (in effect thats what my hacking of the code allows, but only of the  
> parameters included in the scripts)

That is what I am trying NOT to do.  If this were a project where  
development was not as controlled by OpenSRS or had open development  
and those of us who are using it contribute for the benefit of all, I  
would but I'm afraid we have a long way to go for that. I have yet to  
see a bug report or a way of making them that is public so that we all  
see the problems and solutions.  When I have asked for help, it is  
always taken private.  Typical Corporate America.

Thanks for the suggestions,

ed


> Regards
>
> Gordon Hudson
> Hostroute.com Ltd
> www.hostroute.net


_______________________________________________
domains-gen mailing list
[email protected]
http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

Reply via email to