George Kirikos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why not initiate a transfer dispute, using the info at: > http://www.icann.org/dndr/tdrp/approved-providers.htm ? > > instead of wasting time with ICANN? ICANN itself isn't able to do much > under the policy. Creating a precedent either through a complaint to > the registry operator (i.e. VeriSign for .com), or at NAF or ADNDRC > might be the best way to end this issue.
eh? Wait a sec -- isn't Network Solutions the .com registry operator? And wouldn't that be just complaining to Network Solutions *about* Network Solutions? I certainly don't follow the industry as closely as many here. I knew that VeriSign bought Network Solutions many moons ago, and (I thought) that Network Solutions managed the .com registry. And I passingly noted more recently that VeriSign did eventually divest itself of Network Solutions (to whom, I'm not sure). But I'd be surprised and fascinated to hear that, in all the card-shuffling, it was VeriSign and not Network Solutions that ended up controlling the .com registry! ...though I suppose that it hardly matters. Even if they no longer own Network Solutions outright, VeriSign would still hold a significant financial interest in its former property, making the difference between the two somewhat academic. -dave _______________________________________________ domains-gen mailing list [email protected] http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen
