Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi again, > >> Depending on the coverage of Unicode in the font you're using, you may >> find some glyphs (characters) are replaced with your font's one for >> "missing glyph". > > To see what it *should* look like, see > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk/msg01446.html > > mail-archive.com has converted all the different encodings to utf-8. > > The "official" Mailman archive also does that, > > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/private/dorset/2010-April/010201.html > > but generates a web page that claims > > <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> > > so it's up to your browser whether it believes the header or spots that > it's probably utf-8 as it isn't us-ascii. > > Cheers, > Ralph. > > Hi Ralph and Andrew
Thanks for the all info, it made sense once I twigged what was happening as both replies showed different characters! I've tried changing the fonts between ISO and UTF and looked at the link. Decided to use UTF08 for now but may change again later as Ralphs first reply was all over the place, nothing like the link showed. Strange as I'd not noticed it until recently when more e-mails gave strange results. Will copy the link contents to my documents area for future reference. Thanks Clive -- Next meeting: Unknown http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413 Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset
