On Fri, 31 May 2002 10:07:20 -0700, David Stutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For non-commercial work, you are free to modify and distribute even the >Rotor codebase itself as long as you comply with the terms of the >license. You certainly are not required to roll your own work into >Rotor! I would like to clarify something. Andrew asked about "languages/PALs". I can understand that PALs would come under the terms of the Shared Source license, but why languages? Assuming that the developer built a language compiler and library from scratch using standard CLI features, and merely tested it against Rotor, surely the Shared Source license would not "infect" the result so as to require only non-commercial redistribution? Cheers, Rhys.
