My take on this is that if C# or the CLI change in Whidby or Everett and those changes are rolled into the ECMA specs then Rotor is likely to change. I would assume that some changes may go in as a matter if course such those qouted in the article i.e improved performance and security in the CLR etc.
Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas and Elena Husemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 16 July 2002 02:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor 1.1 and/or 2.0? > > > Well there are News reports but no official releases from MS on this. > > According to the report version 1.1 is code name everett and version 2 > is code named Whidby. > > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C3959%2C373783%2C00.asp > > Douglas > > > >With the press releases of Whidby and Everett, can the > Rotor team >publicly > > >comment on the potential future of Rotor beyond the 1.0 >release? > > > > What is Whidby and Everit besides two places where Boeing > people used to > > live ? > > > > I couldn't seem to find the press releases you were referring to. > > > > > > > >From: Ted Neward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor 1.1 and/or 2.0? > > >Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:58:50 -0700 > > > > > > > > >Ted Neward > > >{.NET || Java} Course Author & Instructor, DevelopMentor > > >(http://www.develop.com) > > >http://www.javageeks.com/tneward > > >http://www.clrgeeks.com/tneward > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: > http://messenger.msn.com >
