For that matter, are there *any* changes to the profiles (libraries, in
particular) that will require ECMA standards changes?
Ted Neward
{ .NET && Java } Author, Instructor
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clrgeeks.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeroen Frijters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] 1.1 beta of Rotor?
> One issue I'm particularly interested in is the new
> MethodAttributes.CheckAccessOnOverride flag ("strict" in ilasm). Since
> this is not in the ECMA standard, will Rotor implement it?
>
> Regards,
> Jeroen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI
> > implementation [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> > Behalf Of Ted Neward
> > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 22:25
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [DOTNET-ROTOR] 1.1 beta of Rotor?
> >
> >
> > I notice, from listening on DOTNET-CLR, that the 1.1
> > Framework bits are
> > going to beta availability. Is Rotor keeping up, and
> > therefore we can expect
> > that changes (that are relevant to Rotor) are being brought over?
> >
> > Ted Neward
> > { .NET && Java } Author, Instructor
> > http://www.javageeks.com
> > http://www.clrgeeks.com
> >
>
