thanks to all of you for your instant responses no i hadnt thought of using the syncblock i will try doing that
regards archana On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Jan Kotas wrote: > The computation of offsets in CheckMscorlib does not seem to be > accurate. Try changing: > > < if (!pFD->GetMethodTableOfEnclosingClass()->IsValueClass()) > < offset += sizeof(ObjHeader); > > to: > > if (!pFD->GetMethodTableOfEnclosingClass()->IsValueClass()) > > offset += Object::GetOffsetOfFirstField(); > > Have you considered using syncblock for the extra stuff you need? It > should be much easier. > > -Jan > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Archana > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 8:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [DOTNET-ROTOR] size of the object header > > Hi, > i hope you will excuse me for sending somany mails just over the past > few > days. once i get the hang of it, should be okay > my changes to the collector requires the object header size to be 8 > instead of 4 which is the current obj header size. one potential place > where i need to make changes was indicated by an Assert failure at > binder.cpp::CheckMscorlib() where pOffsets->expectedOffset is compared > with offset. how should i go about making the change to avoid assert > failure. i tried looking for MscorlibFieldOffsets but not able to > understand how its getting populated. Also if i need to make changes in > other critical places it would of immense help if you could mention them > > thanks & regards > archana >
